Writings in Connection with the Donatist Controversy

NOTICE TO SUBSCRIBERS

EDINBURGH, _April 1872_.

Messrs. Clark have much pleasure in publishing the Second Issue of the Works of ST. AUGUSTINE, viz.:--

WRITINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DONATIST CONTROVERSY.

THE ANTI-PELAGIAN WORKS OF ST. AUGUSTINE, Vol. I.

They thank their Subscribers for the kindness with which this new enterprise has been received, and they assure them that no pains will be spared either by Editor or by Publisher to make it worthy of success.

The First Issue of Second Year will be published about OCTOBER, and will comprise the First Volume of the LETTERS, and probably the TREATISES against FAUSTUS the MANICHÆAN.

Now that the ANTE-NICENE SERIES is complete, they trust that as many as possible of those who have subscribed to it will extend their Subscriptions to the WORKS OF ST. AUGUSTINE.

They take this early opportunity of intimating that they intend to follow this Series with the WORKS OF ST. CHRYSOSTOM, but it is by far too early to make any more definite announcement.

An early remittance of the Subscription for Second Year of ST. AUGUSTINE will greatly oblige.

THE WORKS OF AURELIUS AUGUSTINE, BISHOP OF HIPPO.

_A NEW TRANSLATION._

Edited by the REV. MARCUS DODS, M.A.

VOL. III.

WRITINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DONATIST CONTROVERSY.

EDINBURGH: T. & T. CLARK, 38, GEORGE STREET. MDCCCLXXII.

PRINTED BY MURRAY AND GIBB, FOR T. & T. CLARK, EDINBURGH.

LONDON, HAMILTON, ADAMS, AND CO. DUBLIN, JOHN ROBERTSON AND CO. NEW YORK, C. SCRIBNER AND CO.

WRITINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DONATIST CONTROVERSY.

Translated by the

REV. J. R. KING, M.A., VICAR OF ST. PETER'S IN THE EAST, OXFORD; AND LATE FELLOW AND TUTOR OF MERTON COLLEGE, OXFORD.

EDINBURGH: T. & T. CLARK, 38, GEORGE STREET. MDCCCLXXII.

CONTENTS.

ON BAPTISM, AGAINST THE DONATISTS.

BOOK I.

PAGE

He proves that baptism can be conferred outside the Catholic communion by heretics or schismatics, but that it ought not to be received from them; and that it is of no avail to any while in a state of heresy or schism, 1

BOOK II.

In which Augustine proves that it is to no purpose that the Donatists bring forward the authority of Cyprian, bishop and martyr, since it is really more opposed to them than to the Catholics. For that he held that the view of his predecessor Agrippinus, on the subject of baptizing heretics in the Catholic Church when they join its communion, should only be received on condition that peace should be maintained with those who entertained the opposite view, and that the unity of the Church should never be broken by any kind of schism, 31

BOOK III.

Augustine undertakes the refutation of the arguments which might be derived from the Epistle of Cyprian to Jubaianus, to give colour to the view that the baptism of Christ could not be conferred by heretics, 54

BOOK IV.

In which he treats of what follows in the same Epistle of Cyprian to Jubaianus, 79

BOOK V.

He examines the last part of the Epistle of Cyprian to Jubaianus, together with his Epistle to Quintus, the letter of the African Synod to the Numidian bishops, and Cyprian's Epistle to Pompeius, 115

BOOK VI.

In which is considered the Council of Carthage, held under the authority and presidency of Cyprian, to determine the question of the baptism of heretics, 150

BOOK VII.

In which the remaining judgments of the Council of Carthage are examined, 195

ANSWER TO LETTERS OF PETILIAN.

BOOK I.

Written in the form of a letter addressed to the Catholics, in which the first portion of the letter which Petilian had written to his adherents is examined and refuted, 231

BOOK II.

In which Augustine replies to all the several statements in the letter of Petilianus, as though disputing with an adversary face to face, 255

BOOK III.

In this Book Augustine refutes the second letter which Petilianus wrote to him after having seen the first of Augustine's earlier Books. This letter had been full of violent language; and Augustine rather shows that the arguments of Petilianus had been deficient and irrelevant, than brings forward arguments in support of his own statements, 405

ON THE CORRECTION OF THE DONATISTS.

A Letter of Augustine to Boniface, who, as we learn from Epistle 220, was Tribune, and afterwards Count in Africa. In it Augustine shows that the heresy of the Donatists has nothing in common with that of Arius; and points out the moderation with which it was possible to recall the heretics to the communion of the Church through awe of the imperial laws. He adds remarks concerning the savage conduct of the Donatists and Circumcelliones, concluding with a discussion of the unpardonable nature of the sin against the Holy Ghost, 479

INDEX. 521

PREFACE.

The schism of the Donatists, with which the treatises in the present volume are concerned, arose indirectly out of the persecution under Diocletian at the beginning of the fourth century. At that time Mensurius, bishop of Carthage, and his archdeacon Cæcilianus, had endeavoured to check the fanatical spirit in which many of the Christians courted martyrdom; and consequently, on the death of Mensurius in 311, and the elevation of Cæcilianus to the see of Carthage in his place, the opposing party, alleging that Felix, bishop of Aptunga, by whom Cæcilianus had been consecrated, had been a _traditor_, and that therefore his consecration was invalid, set up against him Majorinus, who was succeeded in 315 by Donatus. The party had by this time gained strength, through the professions that they made of extreme purity in the discipline which they maintained, and had gone so far, under the advice of another Donatus, bishop of Casæ Nigræ in Numidia, as to accuse Cæcilianus before the Roman Emperor Constantine,--thus setting the first precedent for referring a spiritual cause to the decision of a civil magistrate. Constantine accepted the appeal, and in 313 the matter was laid for decision before Melchiades, bishop of Rome, and three bishops of the province of Gaul. They decided in favour of the validity of the consecration of Cæcilianus; and a similar verdict was given by a council held at Arles, by direction of the Emperor, in the following year. The party of Majorinus then appealed to the personal judgment of the Emperor, which was likewise given against them, not without strong expressions of his anger at their pertinacity. This was followed by severe laws directed against their schism; but so far from crushing them, the attack seemed only to increase their enthusiasm and develope their resources. And, under the leadership of Donatus, the successor of Majorinus, their influence spread widely throughout Africa, and continued to prevail, in spite of various efforts at their forcible suppression, during the whole of the fourth century. They especially brought on themselves the vengeance of the civil powers, by the turbulence of certain fanatical ascetics who embraced their cause, and who, under the name of Circumcelliones, spread terror through the country, seeking martyrdom for themselves, and offering violence to every one who opposed them.[1]

Towards the close of the century, this schism attracted the attention of Augustine, then a priest of Hippo Regius in Numidia. The controversy seems to have had for him a special attraction, not merely because of its intrinsic importance, but also because of the field which it presented for his unrivalled powers as a dialectician. These the Donatists had recently provoked, by inconsistently receiving back into their body a deacon of Carthage named Maximianus who had separated himself from them, and by recognising as valid all baptism administered by his followers. Hence they naturally shrank from engaging in a contest with an antagonist who was sure to make the most of such a deviation from the very principles on which they based their schism; and, on the other hand, Augustine was so firmly convinced that his own position was impregnable, that he seems to have thought that if he could only secure a thorough and dispassionate discussion of the matter, the Donatists must necessarily be brought to acknowledge not only their theoretical errors, but also the practical sinfulness of their separation from the Church. Throughout the controversy, however, he appears to have put out of sight two considerations: first, the influence of party spirit and prejudice in blinding men to argument; and, secondly, the necessity of treating his opponents in a logical discussion as on an equal footing with himself. The first was in some degree an unavoidable element of disappointment; but Augustine made concession yet more difficult on the part of his opponents, by expecting them to acknowledge his superior position as a member of the Catholic Church, whose duty it was to expose the error of their views. He practically begs the very point at issue, by assuming that he, and not the Donatists, was in the Catholic communion; and though his argument is conducted independently of this premiss, yet it naturally rendered them more unwilling to admit its force.

This dogmatism was of less consequence in the first pamphlet which Augustine published on the subject,--his _Alphabetical Psalm_, in which he set forth the history and errors of the Donatists in a popular form,--since it was not intended as a controversial treatise, but only as a means of enlightening the less educated as to t